Investigation of The Effects of Temperature on Physical, Mechanical And Electrical Conductivity Properties in AISI 310S Austenitic Stainless Steel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15330/pcss.22.1.180-184Keywords:
AISI 310S austenitic stainless steel, mechanical properties, electrical conductivityAbstract
In our study, annealing was done to AISI 310S stainless steel at 800 °C. The effects of these annealing on structural, morphological, mechanical and electrical conductivities were investigated. From XRD results, it has been observed that the material is austenite and cubic in nature. SEM analysis has shown that the surface of AISI 310S steel changes with temperature. The tensile test of the material was made and it was observed that the tensile strength of the material decreased with the effect of temperature. In addition, the conductivity behavior of AISI 310S steel was measured with four probe technique depending on heat treatment. As a result of the measurements, it was observed that the resistance value increased and the conductivity value decreased in the heat treated material.
References
N. Ben Moussa, K. Gharbi, I. Chaieb, and N. Ben Fredj, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 101, 1–4, 435–449 (2019) (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2955-0)
Y. Zhong, C. Zhou, S. Chen, and R. Wang, Chinese J. Mech. Eng. 30, 1, 200–206 (2017)
(https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2016.0420.056)
M. Calmunger, G. Chai, R. Eriksson, S. Johansson, and J. J. Moverare, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 48, 10, 4525–4538 (2017) (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4212-9)
K. Kendall and K. Michaela, Academic Press (2016) (ISBN: 9780124104839)
D. West, J. Hulance, R. L. Higginson, and G. D. Wilcox, Mater. Sci. Technol. (United Kingdom) 29, 7, 835–842 (2013) (https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284712Y.0000000100)
B. Shalchi Amirkhiz, S. Xu, and C. Scott, Materialia, 6, February (2019) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100330)
D. P. Davies, P. L. Adcock, M. Turpin, and S. J. Rowen, J. Appl. Electrochem. 30,1,101–105 (2000) (https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003831406406)
S. C. Singhal,Solid State Ionics152–153, 405–410 (2002) (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00349-1)
L. Niewolak, E. Wessel, L. Singheiser, and W. J. Quadakkers, J. Power Sources195, 22, 7600–7608 (2010) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.007)
Z. Zeng and K. Natesan, Solid State Ionics 167, 1–2, 9–16 (2004) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2003.11.026)
S. Bsat and X. Huang, Oxid. Met. 84, 5–6, 621–631 (2015) (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-015-9591-y)
D. S. Balaji, K. Umanath, S. Prabhakaran, and P. Ramachandran, J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., 9, 2 Special Issue, pp. 779–790 (2017)
A. Mortezaie and M. Shamanian, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 116,1,37–46 (2014) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.01.002)
H. Ji, I. J. Park, S. M. Lee, and Y. K. Lee, J. Alloys Compd. 598, 205–212 (2014) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.038)
J. Erneman, M. Schwind, P. Liu, J. O. Nilsson, H. O. Andrén, and J. Ågren, Acta Mater. 14, 4337–4350 (2004) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.001)
B. Shalchi Amirkhiz, S. Xu, J. Liang, and C. Bibby, 36th Annu. CNS Conf. 40th CNS-CNA Student Conf. - Nucl. 21st Century Glob. Dir. Canada’s Role, no. June (2016)
S. S. M. Tavares, V. Moura, V. C. da Costa, M. L. R. Ferreira, and J. M. Pardal, Mater. Charact. 60, 6, 573–578 (2009) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2008.12.005)
https://www.bssa.org.uk/topics.php?article=139.
Matolich Jr, J. Thermal conductivity and electrical resistiv-ity of type 316 stainless steel from 0 to 1800f (1965).
P. Pichler, B. J. Simonds, J. W. Sowards and G. Pottlacher, Journal of Materials Science 55(9), 4081-4093 (2020) (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04261-6)